Legal Opinion

Bauers v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1998No. S-97-491PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

The plaintiffs, Dennis R. Bauers, Thomas L. Scharbach, Jerry Peterson, James E. Johnson, David C. Bowlin, and Roger L. Carmichael, commenced this action against the defendant, City of Lincoln (City), claiming variously that the City improperly offset payments from a disability pension plan by amounts paid as a result of workers’ compensation awards, and seeking lump-sum returns of their pension contributions.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. We examined the timeliness of the plaintiffs’ filing of their claims against the City in Bauers v. City of Lincoln, 245 Neb. 632,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hass v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Interest of Natasha H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Carlotta P. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API