Legal Opinion

People v. Garner

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 2016No. C079865PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUARTE, J.

Defendant Donald Keith Gamer, who had received a “third strike” sentence based on the commission of knowing receipt of stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)), 1 unsuccessfully filed a Proposition 47 (the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act of 2014) petition to reduce his conviction to a misdemeanor, a petition denied after a hearing upon proof the property was worth over $950. However, the People advised the trial court that defendant was eligible for resentencing under Proposition 36 (the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012), and conceded defendant posed no risk of danger…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. SaibuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. BeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Uriel Gonzalez v. Stuart ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. People v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Hubbard, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Steward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. In re GuiomarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API