Legal Opinion

People v. Bean

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1989No. C003594PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, Acting P. J.

Defendant was charged with burglary and petty theft with a prior conviction. It was alleged he had served a prior prison term for the prior conviction which underlay the section 666 charge. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).) The parties entered into a plea bargain: Defendant was to plead guilty to attempted petty theft with a prior and the court would try the validity of the prior conviction enhancement and entertain defendant’s motion to strike the enhancement. This bargain was implemented. The court denied the motion to strike. The court imposed one-half the upper term of three…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. VasilyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. FinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API