Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1986No. B016757PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

185 Cal.App.3d 831 (1986)

230 Cal. Rptr. 109

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

STERLING HILL, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. B016757.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 19, 1986.

COUNSEL

Dennis E. Mulcahy, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Norman H. Sokolow and Patrick T. Brooks, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ASHBY, Acting P.J.

Appellant Sterling Hill appeals from a resentencing he contends was erroneous. We find the trial court resentence proper…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. VizcarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. BassfordColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API