In re Guiomar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
In March of 2014, petitioner John Manuel Guiomar entered into a plea agreement that resolved four cases and resulted in four convictions (one in each case). The trial court imposed a six-year aggregate sentence, comprised of a four-year term for robbery, a consecutive 16-month term for burglary, a consecutive eight-month term for failure to appear on a felony charge, and a concurrent two-year term for possession of a controlled substance.
In November of 2014, the electorate passed Proposition 47, which reclassified certain felony drug and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Jordan CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. MillsapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017