Legal Opinion

In re Guiomar

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 2016No. H043114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In March of 2014, petitioner John Manuel Guiomar entered into a plea agreement that resolved four cases and resulted in four convictions (one in each case). The trial court imposed a six-year aggregate sentence, comprised of a four-year term for robbery, a consecutive 16-month term for burglary, a consecutive eight-month term for failure to appear on a felony charge, and a concurrent two-year term for possession of a controlled substance.

In November of 2014, the electorate passed Proposition 47, which reclassified certain felony drug and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. Jordan CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. MillsapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API