Beaumont Investors v. Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
On this appeal, we are asked to consider whether a facilities fee enacted by a water district constitutes a “special tax” within the meaning of article XIII A, section 4, of the California Constitution (Prop. 13), and thus must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the electors in the district.
Factual and Procedural Background
On September 4, 1980, the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District Board of Directors (District and Board) adopted resolution No. 80-5 imposing a “facilities fee” payable upon application for connection to its water system. About three months later,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Mills v. County of TrinityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- J. W. Jones Companies v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.