Progressive Insurance v. Heritage Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Karpinski, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Heritage Insurance Company, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Progressive Insurance Company. On appeal, Heritage raises one assignment of error, which argues that the Progressive insurance policy, as opposed to the Heritage insurance policy, provides coverage for the accident involving Jason Dawson. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment below that was in favor of Progressive and affirm as to Heritage.
Jason Dawson was employed by Merhaut Florist on an as-needed basis. Merhaut…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ledyard v. Auto Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cincinnati Insurance v. West American InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2000
- Cooper Tire Rubber v. Travelers Cas. Surety, 5-06-40 (4-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- McGuffin v. Zaremba ContractingOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Progressive Max Ins. Co. v. Matta, 07 Ma 30 (3-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.