Legal Opinion

Burris v. Grange Mutual Companies

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1989No. 88-1036PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

Appellant urges in her first proposition of law that the Grange policy should be interpreted to provide $300,000 of liability coverage. The policy’s declarations page provides liability coverage for bodily injury in the amount of “100,000 EA. PERSON,” and “300,000 EA. OCCURRENCE.”

Under “Part 1-LIABILITY” the policy reads, in part, as follows:

“Coverage A — Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability: To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of:
“A. bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death resulting…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API