Legal Opinion
Cooper Tire Rubber v. Travelers Cas. Surety, 5-06-40 (4-23-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 2007No. 5-06-40PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Cooper Tire Rubber Company ("Cooper") brings this appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hancock County granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Travelers Casualty and Surety Company ("Travelers").
{¶ 2} On February 24, 1993, Kim Caudill ("Caudill"), a Cooper employee was injured while working at Cooper's plant in Findlay, Ohio. Caudill filed a suit for bodily injury resulting from the accident on February 28, 1995. The complaint alleged that Cooper failed to provide a safe place of employment and required Caudill to work in a location…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ward v. United Foundries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- Ward v. United Foundries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010