Legal Opinion

Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 83-1826PublishedCited by 415 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal raises three issues. First, whether summary judgment was appropriate in determining the intended duration of the Landfill Agreement. Second, whether Inland was improperly denied discovery. Third, whether the Landfill Agreement is void as a covenant in restraint of trade.

Civ. R. 56(C) provides that summary judgment shall be rendered only if there “is no genuine issue as to any material fact and * * * the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” If a contract is clear and unambiguous, then its interpretation is a matter of law and there is no issue of fact to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by415 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Long Beach Ass'n v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995

410 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API