Holmes v. . York
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The only question involved in this appeal is whether or not the devisor died intestate as to the lands in controversy? We think not.
L. Ellis Hayes, a witness for plaintiff was asked: “What did Miss L. C. Hodgson tell you, if anything, in regard to the five acres of land now in controversy? Defendants objected, objection sustained. Had the witness been allowed to answer the question, he would have stated that Miss L. 0. Hodgson told him she did not intend this land to go to O. C. York under her will.” This exception and assignments of error cannot be sustained.
The matter has been recently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gordon v. . EhringhausSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Kidder v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- McCullen v. . DaughtrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Brown v. Hamilton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Mangum v. Durham Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coddington v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Redd v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.