Gordon v. . Ehringhaus
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
This is a companion case to Whitehurst v. Gotwalt, 189 N. C., 577, heard at the last term, and in which we had occasion, to consider the validity and meaning of a forfeiture clause or clause against contest, with limitation over, contained in the will of D. B. Bradford. There the litigants were divided into three classes, and such division is applicable here: (1) “Caveators,” or those whose interests in the lands had been forfeited, under the terms of the will, because of their effort to caveat same in the absence of any probable cause therefor; (2) “Neutrals,” or those who took their…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Given v. HiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lamb v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of MinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Cox v. . McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.