Legal Opinion

Mangum v. Durham Loan & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

The plaintiffs contend that upon the death of Bart Mangum the principal, or corpus, of the fund should be turned over to his children, the plaintiffs, who were living at his death, “share and share alike.” On the other hand, the defendant contends that it should pay over to the children of Bart Mangum, share and share alike, not the principal, or corpus, of the fund, but the proceeds of said fund, or, in other words, the income thereof. We think the contention of plaintiffs correct. The primary purpose of construing a will is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the maker. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phelps v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Pilley v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Patterson v. . McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Kidder v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Austin v. . AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jolley v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Holmes v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Coffield v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. White v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966
  5. Parks v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API