Legal Opinion

McCullen v. . Daughtry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.

The one question presented by this appeal is what was the true meaning and intent of the testator in the seventh item of his will when he used the words, “money on hand after paying for my funeral expenses.” The. intention of the testator is the guiding star in this search. Technical definitions give way to popular uses of words when the context shows a nontechnical use. Jones v. Myatt, 153 N. C., 225; Schouler on Wills, sec. 470; Gardner on Wills, 403; Foil v. Newsome, 138 N. C., 115; Page v. Foust, 89 N. C., 447.

There is always a presumption that a testator did not intend to die partially…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Decker v. DeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Dillard v. DillardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  3. Rees v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Dunn v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Rollins v. . KeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Scales v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Holmes v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Shackleford v. DobbsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API