Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. South Peninsula Hospital

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2003No. S-10484PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

John and Susan Fletcher appeal to this court on three theories under which they argue South Peninsula Hospital should be held liable for the alleged negligence of an independent contractor surgeon who has staff privileges at the hospital. First, the Fletchers assert that the trial court erred in refusing to extend to the operating room the “non-delegable duty” vicarious liability that we applied to hospitals in Jackson v. Power 1 with respect to emergency room negligence. Second, the Fletchers argue that the trial court erred in granting South…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Albain v. Flower HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Clark v. Southview Hospital & Family Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Larson v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Brookins Ex Rel. Gotcher v. MoteMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Rolph v. Hobart & William Smith CollegesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API