Legal Opinion
Prochazka v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 30, 2012No. 06-827CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
In 1980, Congress enacted the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act, Pub.L. No. 96-513, 94 Stat. 2835 (1980) (“DOPMA”) requiring, among other directives in this omnibus legislation, that all military services compute an officer’s mandatory retirement date, based on “active commissioned service.” 10 U.S.C. § 634 (1982). For those officers who had pre-DOPMA and post-DOPMA service, “active commissioned service” was to be computed by adding “service creditable” prior to September 15, 1981, to all subsequent “active commissioned service.” DOPMA §…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prochazka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- MARCIA OSHINAIKE v.SOLOMON ADEDOLAPO OSHINAIKEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016