Legal Opinion
Arroyo v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 14, 2014No. 1:11-cv-00595PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge:
Plaintiff Sergeant Arroyo, a member of the Air Force Reserve, has filed this lawsuit pro se, claiming that the Air Force improperly allowed his active duty orders to expire when, according to Sergeant Arroyo, he was entitled under applicable regulations to remain on active duty for disability processing. He seeks restoration to active duty for disability processing, back pay, an admonishment of the Air Force Reserve Command for delaying and mismanaging his disability processing, and “such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.” Compl. (Prayer for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Schow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025