Legal Opinion
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 2008No. 06-35538, 06-35542, 06-35543PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 29, 2008 is amended as follows:
At Slip Op. p. 1426, line 5-9, replace < includes a severability provision. See RCW 66.28.090. That section provides: “If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.” Id. > with chas explicitly allowed for sev-erability since it was enacted. See RCW 66.98.020, 080, and 090. >
At Slip Op. p. 1426, line 12-13, replace <does raise a presumption that such is the State’s…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- TFWS, Inc. v. FranchotCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital v. Washington State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Alarm Detection Systems, Incor v. Orland Fire Protection DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.