Legal Opinion

Winters v. SHELTON ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is a suit by the plaintiff, seeking specific performance of a contract of sale of personal property, or damages in lieu thereof if specific performance is impracticable.

The defendants were the owners of the stock, fixtures, equipment and good will of a poolroom and beer parlor known as “Shelton’s Pastime” in Hood River, Oregon, for some years prior to July, 1955.

The plaintiff, Earl J. Winters, and Herman Yan Ras were employed by the defendants at a salary of $65 per week each, sometimes in conjunction with others, to operate the place for the defendants.

On July 7, 1955, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Tigglebeck v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Smith v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Percy v. MILLEROregon Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gaffi v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hill v. OlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Meister v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Miller v. Estate of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API