Legal Opinion

Caveny v. ASHEIM

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1954PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This matter is unique in that it brings for our consideration as one matter two appeals and a petition for a writ of mandamus, all springing from the same case and here consolidated for argument and final disposition.

The salient facts requisite for an understanding of the instant controversy arise out of a contract made on August 18, 1948. It was an agreement for the sale and purchase of residential property in an *201area known as Gable Park in Washington county. The purchasers were Ednamae F. Caveny, plaintiff in the suit hereinafter referred to, and her now deceased husband, Kasper P. Caveny.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Brin v. MichalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. EstesOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Belleville v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API