Legal Opinion

Jordan v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1987No. WCB 84-10417; CA A39377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Claimant seeks reversal of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that medical treatment of her mild carpal tunnel syndrome is not compensable. On de novo review, we reverse and remand.

Claimant first began to feel pain in her wrist in September, 1980, when she was working part time as a furniture builder. She testified that the repeated use of a rubber mallet in hammering boards together caused pain. The doctor who examined claimant at that time diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome and synovitis. Dr. Robertson, whom claimant began seeing immediately thereafter, also diagnosed carpal tunnel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weiland v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Taylor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Bradshaw v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Blokland v. OR. HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Hansen v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Senters v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API