Legal Opinion

Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T Broadband

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 2006No. 04-05568; A128708Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 P.3d 315 (2006)

208 Or. App. 563

In the Matter of the Compensation of Jerry E. Mize, Claimant.

Jerry E. MIZE, Petitioner,

v.

COMCAST CORP-AT & T BROADBAND, Respondent.

04-05568; A128708.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 25, 2006.

Decided October 11, 2006.

George J. Wall, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Welch, Bruun & Green.

Howard R. Nielsen argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was The Gilroy Law Firm, P.C.

Before WOLLHEIM, Presiding Judge, and EDMONDS[*] and ARMSTRONG, Judges.

EDMONDS, J.

The threshold issue in this case…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API