Legal Opinion

Van Blokland v. OR. HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1987No. 83-06632; CA A42003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which affirmed the referee’s award of an additional 35 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability of the low back, rejected claimant’s contention that the claim had been prematurely closed and upheld SAIF’s denial of payment for a weight loss program. On de novo review, we hold that the weight loss program is compensable and that the claim was prematurely closed.

Claimant is five feet six inches tall. Her weight has fluctuated from 234 pounds (in November 1981) to 300 pounds (in April 1983). She had compensable left…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wait v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schuening v. J.R. Simplot & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Taylor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Hoffman v. Bumble Bee Seafoods (No. 29147)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Krier v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. GirardotWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hansen v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API