Legal Opinion

Gagosian v. Burdick's Television & Appliances

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1967No. Civ. 23926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

This is an action for damages for bodily injuries allegedly sustained when plaintiff’s car, at a stop sign, was struck from the rear by a car driven by defendant Hutcheon in the course of his employment by defendants Burdick. Jury verdict and judgment were for defendants. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was granted, and defendants appeal.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies unconditionally, or “as a matter of law,” when undisputed evidence establishes that plaintiff’s car was stationary when struck from behind by defendants' vehicle (Alarid v. Vanier, 50 Cal.2d 617 [327 P.2d 897] ;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Guerra v. Handlery Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kite v. Coastal Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Persike v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hunsaker v. Bozeman Deaconess FoundationMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mesecher v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Kennelly v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Dixon Mobile Homes, Inc. v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Roberts v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API