Persike v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
This ease presents, at first glance, a singular aspect, because plaintiffs, husband and wife, protected by seat belts, were seated in a vehicle waiting behind another vehicle for a red light to change, when their car was rear-ended by defendant’s vehicle, and plaintiff wife developed a herniated disk which the two doctors called by the defense said was related to the accident (they were uncertain as to the degree of causation); but the jury, by nine to three vote, found for defendant shortly after the case was submitted to them.
Facts of the Accident
Defendant testified that he was driving…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Jensen v. MinardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Guerra v. Handlery Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Gagosian v. Burdick's Television & AppliancesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Souden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Beck v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.