Legal Opinion

Kennelly v. Burgess

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1995No. 43PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

The issue this Court must resolve in the instant case is whether, in a medical malpractice case, a jury instruction that “an unsuccessful result following medical treatment is not evidence 0/negligence” is erroneous. We must also consider whether, having given this “mere happening” type of instruction, the trial court should have given an additional instruction that an expert witness may infer negligence from the negative results of a medical procedure. We hold that the instruction as given was erroneous. We further hold that, even had the first instruction been a proper “mere…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. GendaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Hunsaker v. Bozeman Deaconess FoundationMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Levine v. RendlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Fairfax Savings, F.S.B. v. Kris Jen Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cook v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API