Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Automobile Insurance Exchange

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1923No. 17800PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— This is an action on a policy of insurance issued to the respondent by the appellant to cover an automobile, subsequently damaged by fire. The appellant defended on the ground that warranties made by the respondent had been breached and that it was therefore not liable. The contention of the respondent is that he is not responsible for the making of the warranties. Assuming the respondent’s version of the facts, they are that he sought the insurance by *488signing a blank application, and that the appellant’s agent, without his knowledge, filled in the statements which were untrue, in this:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Quinn v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Eaton v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Devenny v. Automobile Owners Inter-Insurance Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kay v. Occidental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hein v. Family Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Williams v. Pacific States Fire Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API