Legal Opinion

Kay v. Occidental Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1947No. 30156PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Only one question is here presented: Was there any credible evidence from which a jury could have determined that certain false representations or warranties in the application for a policy of life insurance were made without intent to deceive? The trial court answered no and took the case from the jury.

The falsity of certain representations is conceded, but it is appellant’s position that a jury could find from the evidence that they were not made with intent to deceive.

We have a statute which provides:

“Warranty not to avoid policy unless deceptive. No oral or written misrepresentation or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Johnson International Co. v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. Ki Sin Kim v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Bates v. Bowles White & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Karpenski v. American General Life Companies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API