Legal Opinion

Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & Daines

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2008No. 20061044PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Appellants Seott Barrett and Robert Slusher, a client of Barrett's and former client of Appellees, appeal the trial court's rulings in favor of Christensen & Jensen, P.C. (formerly Christensen, Jensen and Powell, P.C.) and its attorney, L. Rich Humpher-ys (collectively, Appellees) on claims arising from the Campbell v. State Farm case. 1

BACKGROUND

T2 In 1981, Curtis Campbell, Robert Slusher, and Todd Ospital were involved in an automobile accident that claimed the life of Todd Ospital and left Slusher permanently paralyzed. Curtis was insured by State Farm…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bennett v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonoughUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Gables at Sterling Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Castlewood-Sterling Vill. I, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. USA POWER, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API