El Dorado Oil Works v. McColgan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the amounts assessed against it as additional franchise taxes by defendant, under authority of the Bank and Corporation Franchise Tax Act (Stats. 1929, p. 19, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, Act 8488, p. 4763; 1933 Supp., p. 2329; 1935 Supp., p. 1929), for the taxable years 1935 and 1936, which taxes were based respectively upon income for the years 1934 and 1935, and were paid under protest. The trial court found in defendant’s favor, and from the judgment accordingly entered, plaintiff appeals.
The sole point in controversy is the propriety of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Moore v. California State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Robinson v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Horn v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.