Legal Opinion
Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy
California Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1992No. S017399PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
We granted review in this case to determine whether persons unlicensed, by the State Board of Accountancy (Board), the public agency charged with administering the regulatory scheme governing the profession of public accountancy in California (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 50001 et seq., commonly known as the Accountancy Act), may hold themselves out to the public as “accountants,” or as persons qualified and lawfully able to offer “accounting” services for compensation.
*1004As will be shown, under California’s regulatory scheme, accounting activities falling within the statutory…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.