Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1992No. S019095PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We are asked to construe Government Code section 12926, subdivision (c) (section 12926(c)), which defines “employer” for purposes of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), and to determine whether under that section and the *231administrative regulation implementing it, plaintiff was properly subjected to the jurisdiction of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission (FEHC).1

The particular focus of our inquiry is the meaning of the statutory term “regularly employing” as applied to a person who has more than five employees, but has as…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Stevenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API