Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. State Construction Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1955PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This suit was originally commenced as an action at law to recover the sum of $8,634.95 and was brought by the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, as plaintiff, against State Construction Company, a corporation, and Continental Casualty Company, a corporation, as defendants. Defendants answered plaintiff’s complaint and affirmatively pleaded matters arising out of the facts requiring the interposition of a court of equity, and material to their defense in the law action, and prayed for affirmative relief. Pursuant to the provisions of ORB 16.460, the action at law was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. St. Nicholas Church v. KroppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Board of School Commissioners v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Rotenberry v. HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Mississippi State Bldg. Com'n v. Becknell Const. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Boise Junior College District v. Mattefs Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Highlands Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API