Legal Opinion

Kutsche v. Ford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1923No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial judge filed an opinion which we adopt:

“School district No. 5, Springwells township, Wayne county, wanting a new school building erected, according to plans and specifications prepared by architects, the school board advertised for competitive bids-Each bidder was required to deposit a certified check equal to five per cent, of the bid made, to be forfeited in case of acceptance of the bid and refusal of contract by the bidder. Plaintiff is a contractor and bidder residing in Detroit and after examination of the plans and specifications, prepared his estimates and on the day…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patrick v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. St. Nicholas Church v. KroppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Board of School Commissioners v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Wood v. CallaghanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bromagin v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Stryker Corporation v. Christopher RidgewayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. State Highway Commission v. State Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API