Legal Opinion

Boise Junior College District v. Mattefs Construction Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1969No. 10200PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

The issue presented is whether, under the circumstances of this case, a contractor is entitled to the equitable relief of rescission when it has submitted a bid which contains a material clerical mistake. We conclude that such relief is available.

Mattefs Construction Company (hereinafter termed respondent) was one of ten bidders on a construction contract to be let by Boise Junior College District (hereinafter referred to as appellant). Along with its bid respondent submitted the customary bid bond containing a promise to pay the difference between its bid and the next higher…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Johannsen v. UtterbeckIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Powder Horn Constructors, Inc. v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Rosecrans v. Intermountain Soap & Chemical Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re: Ual Corporation, Debtors. Appeal Of: U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Westway Construction, Inc. v. Idaho Transportation DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API