Legal Opinion

Hearne v. Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 23, 1874No. 51PublishedCited by 119 opinions

Appeal in equity from the decree of the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts. Hearne filed a bill in the court below against the New England Mutual Marine Insurance Company to reform a contract of insurance, he alleging that the policy as made out did not conform to the. agreement of the parties,- taking that agreement with the usage or custom which he insisted entered into, and-formed a pan of it.

Read the full summary

Appeal in equity from the decree of the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts. Hearne filed a bill in the court below against the New England Mutual Marine Insurance Company to reform a contract of insurance, he alleging that the policy as made out did not conform to the. agreement of the parties,- taking that agreement with the usage or custom which he insisted entered into, and-formed a pan of it. The case Was thus: On the 7th of May, 1866, Hearne mad'e his application by litter to. the company .for insurance. He said: The bark Maria Henry is chartered to go from Liverpool to Cuba…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne

having stated the case,.delivered

-the opinion of the court.. The reformation of written contracts for fraud or mistake' 'is an ordinary head of equity-jurisdiction. The-rules which govern the exercise of this power are founded in good sense and.are well settled.- Where the agreement as reduced-to -writing, omits or contains térms of stipulations contrary to the common intention of the parties, the instrument will -be corrected so as to make it couform to their real intent. The parties will be placed as they would have stood if the mis-, .take had not-occurred. *

Thé party alleging the mistake…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Fire Insurance v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  2. Baldwin v. MildebergerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API