Legal Opinion
Rotenberry v. Hooker
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 2003No. 2002-CA-00096-SCTPublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
864 So.2d 266 (2003)
Clinton Grice ROTENBERRY, Jr.
v.
Scottye R. HOOKER.
No. 2002-CA-00096-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
November 6, 2003.
Rehearing Denied January 22, 2004.
Vaughn Davis, Jackson, attorney for appellant.
Dana J. Swan, Clarksdale, attorney for appellee.
EN BANC.
WALLER, Justice, for the Court.
¶ 1. Scottye R. Hooker and Clinton Grice Rotenberry, Jr., were sole and equal beneficiaries of a trust. Hooker made an offer to sell Rotenberry her one-half interest in a farm held by the trust. Rotenberry accepted the offer, but Hooker rejected the acceptance because of a perceived…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Cherry v. Anthony, Gibbs, SageMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Cooper v. CrabbMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- IP TIMBERLANDS OPERATING CO. LTD. v. DenmissMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Pursue Energy Corp. v. PerkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Richardson v. RileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Leonard v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- A & F PROP. v. Madison County Bd. of Sup'rsMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Grenada Living Center, LLC v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Sikora v. VanderploegCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Estate of Davis v. O'NEILLMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.