Legal Opinion

Chrisman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1987No. D005948PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, Acting P. J.

We grant Leroy and Joseph Chrisman’s petition for a writ of prohibition and mandate to prohibit the superior court from requiring a de novo trial of their underinsured motorist claim and to direct the court to confirm an arbitration award obtained on the underinsured motorist claim against their insurer General Accident Insurance Company (General). We hold the state’s statutory scheme guarantees insureds who incur damages from underinsured motorists the same binding arbitration rights as those available to ««insured motorists pursuant to Insurance Code 1 section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. In Re Lisa R.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. United Nuclear Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Sacramento County Welfare Department v. Victor R.California Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Aragon-Haas v. Family Security Insurance ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API