Legal Opinion

In Re Dibley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1987No. C6-86-1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Dibley seeks review of a September 11 commitment order finding him to be mentally ill and dangerous, an October 7 order denying his motion for new trial, and an October 22 order committing him for an indeterminate period and finding that he remains mentally ill and dangerous. Dib-ley complains of ineffective assistance of counsel at the initial hearing on the petition, improper admission of the opinions of the court appointed examiner, who Dibley claims was not qualified, and insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court. We affirm the trial court.

FACTS

W…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Matter of MalmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Matter of HarhutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Sather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of JostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re the Welfare of HofmasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Beaulieu v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Matter of ClementsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API