Legal Opinion
Matter of Jost
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1990No. C4-88-2349, C5-89-751PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
We granted the separate petitions for further review of James L. Jost and Charles T. Gardner to consider the propriety of the court of appeals dismissal of their respective appeals from orders of the district court denying their motions for a new trial in commitment proceedings. We reverse and remand to the court of appeals for consideration and disposition of the appeals on their respective merits.
Jost was originally found to be mentally ill and dangerous and was committed to the Minnesota Security Hospital on December 4, 1987. After further proceedings pursuant to Minn.Stat.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re DibleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Matter of JostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of RinglandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re IrwinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. SpeeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of BowersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.