State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Paul Peterson challenges the trial court’s order granting a new trial based on the jury’s knowledge of the affect of the verdict on insurance coverage. Peterson also challenges the subsequent summary judgment for State Farm on the issue of the intentional act exclusion. We affirm the order for a new trial but reverse the order for summary judgment.
FACTS
Stephen Kintop shot and killed himself after firing four rounds into the head of Paul Peterson. Peterson, although seriously injured, survived the incident and sued Kintop’s estate for damages. The special administrator of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Johnson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Education Minnesota-Greenway, Local 1330 v. Independent School District No. 316Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- American National Fire Insurance Co. v. CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.