Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1990No. C4-90-312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Paul Peterson challenges the trial court’s order granting a new trial based on the jury’s knowledge of the affect of the verdict on insurance coverage. Peterson also challenges the subsequent summary judgment for State Farm on the issue of the intentional act exclusion. We affirm the order for a new trial but reverse the order for summary judgment.

FACTS

Stephen Kintop shot and killed himself after firing four rounds into the head of Paul Peterson. Peterson, although seriously injured, survived the incident and sued Kintop’s estate for damages. The special administrator of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Johnson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Education Minnesota-Greenway, Local 1330 v. Independent School District No. 316Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. American National Fire Insurance Co. v. CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API