Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Harhut

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. C0-85-339 to C4-85-344PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

All six patients are mentally retarded wards of the State residing at Faribault State Hospital. Pursuant to legislative mandate, new commitment petitions were filed for each patient. After individual hearings, all were committed back to Fari-bault. Appeals were filed by the commitment petitioners from the orders for commitment and notices of review were filed by all of the patients except Harhut. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

William Harhut, Jr. has been a patient at Faribault State Hospital since July 1, 1980. In addition to his retardation, the patient is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of WicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of KennedyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Guardianship of GlennCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Matter of KnappCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of HarhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. In Re DibleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Matter of ClementsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Matter of CieminskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API