Legal Opinion

Artromick International, Inc. v. Drustar, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 31, 1991No. C2-86-0554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE P. KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent and service mark case which also includes various state law claims and counterclaims. It was filed more than four years ago and, as evidenced by the size of the court’s file (which contains 106 separate filings to date, not including depositions), has been actively litigated. For most of that time, Drustar, Inc., one of the defendants, was represented by Kevin R. McDermott and other attorneys from the law firm of Murphy, Young and Smith or its subsequent merger partner, Squire, Sanders and Dempsey.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Brown v. JohnstoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Manoir-Electroalloys Corp. v. Amalloy Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  4. Heathcoat v. Santa Fe International Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Hyatt Legal Services (In Re Dow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  2. Sws Financial Fund a v. Salomon Bros. Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Thayer v. Fuller & Henry, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Rossana v. Momot (In Re Rossana)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  5. National Medical Care, Inc. v. Home Medical of America, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API