Thayer v. Fuller & Henry, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Jack Thayer brings this legal malpractice suit against his former attorneys, defendants Fuller & Henry, Ltd. (Fuller & Henry) and David R. Bain-bridge. Pending is defendants’ summary judgment motion, in which defendants argue that Thayer’s action is barred by Ohio’s one-year statute of limitations on legal malpractice actions. Because I conclude that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to when the attorney-client relationship between Thayer and defendants terminated, defendants’ motion shall be denied.
Background
In September, 1999, Thayer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. ConleyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bartenberger v. DamonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Jose Junior v. Ferreira de SousaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. John F. HussellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. John F. HussellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Walters v. RoyerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011