Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Fuller & Henry, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 18, 2007No. 3:05CV7275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Jack Thayer brings this legal malpractice suit against his former attorneys, defendants Fuller & Henry, Ltd. (Fuller & Henry) and David R. Bain-bridge. Pending is defendants’ summary judgment motion, in which defendants argue that Thayer’s action is barred by Ohio’s one-year statute of limitations on legal malpractice actions. Because I conclude that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to when the attorney-client relationship between Thayer and defendants terminated, defendants’ motion shall be denied.

Background

In September, 1999, Thayer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Smith v. ConleyOhio Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartenberger v. DamonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  2. Jose Junior v. Ferreira de SousaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. John F. HussellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. John F. HussellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Walters v. RoyerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API