Legal Opinion

Sculley v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, 302PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiff, Mary I. Scully, brought an action of trespass against the City of Philadelphia to recover damages for injuries sustained by her as the result of a fall allegedly due to a hole or depression in the surface of Lancaster Avenue. The defect in the street was between the rails of one of the trolley tracks of the Philadelphia Transportation Company, and the City brought in the Company as an additional defendant. A jury returned a verdict of $3,200 against both defendants. The Transportation Company filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lerner v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Culver v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Williams v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Duddy v. Conshohocken Printing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BavusaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Irrera v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Morris v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Mull v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Perry v. ErlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API