Legal Opinion

Morris v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1956No. Appeals, 48 and 49PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno,

The only subject for consideration on the appeal in this case is whether the jury should have been permitted to pass on the questions of negligence and contributory negligence. It is clear from the record that the factual issues involved were strictly for the jury.

On January 10 and 11, 1954, a heavy snow (8 inches) fell in and around Bryn Mawr, Montgomery County. Two days later a temporary thaw set in and this was followed by a freezing temperature which solidified and corrugated the snow, slush and small pools of water into a rough, icy carpet of ruts, ridges…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Steck v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Nettis v. General Tire Co. of Philadelphia, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hammond v. AllegrettiIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hanson v. Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Kremer v. Carr's Food Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API