Legal Opinion

Irrera v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1413PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

Appellants are Immaculate Irrera and her husband Joseph Irrera. They appeal from the entry of summary judgment against them and in favor of Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority.

On July 13, 1970, Mrs. Irrera injured herself when she tripped and fell while crossing 8th Street at Tasker Street, in Philadelphia. Her fall was due to a hole or depression in the surface of the street near but not between SEPTA’s trolley tracks. On August 10, 1970, notice of Mrs. Irrera’s claim was given to the City of Philadelphia.1 On July 3, 1972, ten days before the statute of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Deemer v. Weaver, Exrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Plazak v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. McGowan v. University of ScrantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Taylor v. TukanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API