Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS Bank
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE EAKIN.
The sole issue before this Court is whether a bank must have actual knowledge that it is dealing with a fiduciary at the time of a transaction in order for the bank to be entitled to the protections of § 9 of the Uniform Fiduciaries Act (UFA).1 We hold that a bank need not have actual knowledge it is dealing with a fiduciary in order to be protected under § 9 of the UFA, and therefore reverse the order of the Superior Court.
Appellee, Springfield Township, retained Robert J. Kuss through his firm, Robert J. Kuss & Associates, Inc., to manage and administer pension plans…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Coretsky v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Coeur D'Alene Mining Co. v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnson v. Citizens National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bucci v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- White v. Conestoga Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cohen v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Alberton v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Nisenzon v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.