Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Chicago Title Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 5, 2007No. CIV.A.06-873PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SANCHEZ, District Judge.
Pearl Cohen asks this Court to certify a class of all those mortgagors in Pennsylvania who refinanced and bought a lender’s policy from Chicago Title Insurance Co., paying more than Chicago Title’s filed rate structure provides. Chicago Title argues lenders’ policies are provided by independent brokers, whose records are not assembled in a single *297database, making certification of a class legally and factually impossible. Because I find the class meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, I will certify the class.
FACTS1
The facts of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Fazio v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Allen v. Holiday UniversalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Horton v. Usaa Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Lewis v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.