Legal Opinion

White v. Conestoga Title Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 2012PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

Alleging that Appellant Conestoga Title Insurance Company (“Conestoga” or the “Company”) charged more for title insurance than its filed rates permitted, Appel-lee Nancy A. White asserted three claims against Conestoga in a class action complaint. We granted review to consider whether White is precluded from pursuing all of her claims because Article VII of the Insurance Department Act of 1921 (hereinafter, the “TIA”)1 provides her with an exclusive administrative remedy under Section 1504 of the Statutory Construction Act of 1972 (the “SCA”).2 For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. A.M.S. v. M.R.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Slapikas v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. LindsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API